Approximation of the Effects of Subgrid Variations in Geometry in a Regional Ocean Model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accounting for the effects of subgrid features in a numerical model is a longstanding problem in surface water hydrodynamics. This problem arises in several ways: in many cases, objects in the flow are too small in scale to consider resolving, and in other cases, there can be tremendous savings in computer resources by limiting the resolution. At least two approaches can be used for estimating these effects. In a general method using double-averaging techniques, volume averages are calculated and include terms that arise from the stresses exerted by the subgrid objects. In another method primarily used to account for subgrid topographic variations, the subgrid data is incorporated directly into the model. The first method leads to the inclusion of form drag and is illustrated by studies of flow through vegetation on a river floodplain and tidal power potential of turbines placed in Minas Passage in the Bay of Fundy. The second method is illustrated by a study of tsunami runup on the west coast of Vancouver Island.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".