MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2321761901

Electrochemical Sensing of DNA with Porous Silicon Layers

2007· article· en· W2321761901 on OpenAlexaff
J. E. Lugo, M. Victoria Lorenzo Ocampo, Andrew G. Kirk, David V. Plant, Philippe M. Fauchet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorous siliconBiosensorSiliconGuanineElectrochemistryDetection limitMaterials scienceNanostructureDNARutheniumPorosityNanotechnologyChemistryElectrodeOptoelectronicsChromatographyOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryBiochemistryGeneNucleotide
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The nanostructure known as porous silicon is an excellent material for sensing applications. Due to its large internal surface, it is capable of adsorbing an enormous amount of different compounds. The average porous size can be easily adjusted to allow the pene- tration of molecular compounds with different sizes. In this work we show a sensing application for porous silicon. We have fabricated a biosensor from DNA. The biosensor is an electrochemical device that transduces the hybridization of DNA into a chemical oxidation of guanine by , the reduced form of which is then detected electrochemically. The anodic peak current of was linearly related to the target DNA sequence in the range 0.5×10 -10 - 500×10 -10 M with a detection limit of 0.5×10 -10 M. In addition the ruthenium bipyridine indicator was able to selectively discriminate against different DNA sequences; a necessary property for sensing applications. + 2 3 ) (bpy Ru + 2 3 ) (bpy Ru

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→