MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321786671 · doi:10.1386/vi.4.2.97_1

Resistance and intervention through a radical ethical aesthetic: The art of Gu Xiong

2015· article· en· W2321786671 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueVisual Inquiry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Canadian institutionsEmily Carr University of Art and DesignUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistance (ecology)ImmigrationSubjectivityIdentity (music)SociologyAestheticsCensorshipGender studiesPoliticsArtPolitical scienceLawPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article biographically describes the identity and artistic development of internationally known artist Gu Xiong. Stories of his life during the Cultural Revolution in China and his immigration experience into Canada are expressed and documented through his multiple roles in a community-engaged research study that explores issues of migration, identity, place, displacement, community and the changing nature of geography. Gu Xiong’s unique immigration experiences are contextualized within a mutual encounter of co-shaping between his artist-self and immigrant-self experience. As a cultural worker, created metaphors become the markers of his journey. Despite multiple censorship of his contemporary art and research in his birth country, his approach to creative resistance is a radical ethical aesthetic that unfolds with a neo-vitalist political subjectivity. The outcome is an imminent future vision of hope for a complex world that nourishes individual hybrid identities, interconnected cultures and free societies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it