MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321834188 · doi:10.1061/9780784479414.027

Design and Testing of 500kV Double Circuit Monopoles for the Heartland Transmission Project in Edmonton, Alberta

2015· article· en· W2321834188 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kishor Kumar, Jason Dwyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSuperconducting Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)BP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConceptual designSection (typography)Transmission lineCommissionScope (computer science)EngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Heartland Transmission Project is a recently built 500kV double circuit transmission line near Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. The scope of the project was to connect the existing Ellerslie Substation, located within Edmonton, to the new Heartland Substation, located approximately 65 kilometers northeast of Edmonton in the Heartland Industrial Area, near Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta. Approximately half of the line was built within a designated Transportation and Utility Corridor (TUC) with a section passing between the communities of Edmonton and Sherwood Park. The Alberta Utility Commission (AUC) declared that a 10 km section of the line passing between the communities of Edmonton and Sherwood Park were to be built using tubular steel structures rather than the traditional lattice steel towers. The process of developing a family of tubular monopoles consisting of tangent, light, and medium angle suspension towers and site-specific dead-end towers is outlined. The design, from a conceptual stage through to the project’s completion is discussed. Topics will cover the development of pole design requirement drawings, structure design, manufacturing, full scale testing, and foundation design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.149
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSuperconducting Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207