MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321837609 · doi:10.1515/secm.2011.026

Non-linear buckling analysis of tapered curved composite plates

2011· article· en· W2321837609 on OpenAlex
Shaikh Akhlaque-E-Rasul, Rajamohan Ganesan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueScience and Engineering of Composite Materials · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBucklingMaterials scienceShell (structure)Parametric statisticsFinite element methodRADIUSStructural engineeringDeformation (meteorology)Composite numberComposite materialGeometryMathematicsEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Linear formulations are insufficient to take into account the effect of large deflections that occur after initial buckling. This effect can only be considered in the non-linear buckling analysis. In the present work, the non-linear analysis is carried out using the finite element method based on first-order shear deformation shell theories. Two non-linear shell theories, Donnel’s and Sanders’ theories, are used in the analysis. Based on the first-ply failure analysis and non-linear buckling analysis, the critical sizes and parameters of the tapered curved plates that will not fail before global buckling are determined. A parametric study that encompasses the effects of taper angle, critical length-to-height ratio, radius, radius-to-thickness ratio and geometric parameters of the plates is conducted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it