MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Challenges and Next Steps for Land-use Regression Models

2010· article· en· W2321859764 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julian Marshall, Perry Hystad, Eric V. Novotny, Michael Bräuer

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAir pollutionParticulatesWork (physics)Regression analysisMeteorologyEnvironmental resource managementGeographyStatisticsMathematicsEcologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S-30B1-5 Background/Aims: This talk addresses lessons learned, challenges, and next steps in the application of the land-use regression (LUR) model approach for air pollution exposure assessment. Specifically, we will discuss creating national LUR models, developing LUR models for developing countries, and matching the spatial resolution of LUR models with microenvironment location information. Methods: We developed national LUR models using fixed site monitors for the United States and Canada (obtained from the US Environmental Protection Agency and NAPS respectively), land use characteristics, and satellite pollutant measurements. Results: For the United States, models were developed for annual average (R2: 0.78) and seasonal (R2: 0.73–0.77) concentrations of NO2. For Canada, models were developed for annual average concentration of particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) (R2 = 0.44) and several gases: NO2, Benzene, Ethyl benzene, and Butadiene (R2: 0.62–0.69). Within-city variability is predicted reasonably well for the US model, but requires further work for the Canadian model. A second area of current work involves LUR in Delhi, India, for PM2.5, black carbon, and particle number concentrations. Preliminary results suggest differing spatial patterns in India compared to typical North American contexts and the need for different predictor variables—for example, in high-density low-income neighborhoods where in-home combustion sources are predominantly solid fuels, PM2.5 concentrations may be higher away from a roadway than near a roadway. Our third area of current work is to improve microenvironment location information for exposure estimation. This work builds on prior mobility-based exposure models. CAREX Canada has developed “daytime” location estimates from satellite data at block and dissemination areas, to calculate population exposure estimates using LUR models. Following on earlier work using geocoded activity diaries and logging GPS, we are working with smart-phone GPS technology to estimate individual exposures based on location. Conclusion: The use of national scale LUR models shows promise. Expanding to developing counties and improving the microenvironment information present a set of challenges to be addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiologySame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207