MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321937815 · doi:10.1515/anly-2015-5002

M-convolutions of products and ratios, statistical distributions and fractional calculus

2015· article· en· W2321937815 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalysis · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractional calculusMathematicsCalculus (dental)Applied mathematicsStatisticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It is shown that Mellin convolutions of products and ratios in the real scalar variable case can be considered as densities of products and ratios of two independently distributed real scalar positive random variables. It is also shown that these are also connected to Krätzel integrals and to the Krätzel transform in applied analysis, to reaction-rate probability integrals in astrophysics and to other related aspects when the random variables have gamma or generalized gamma densities, and to fractional calculus when one of the variables has a type-1 beta density and the other variable has an arbitrary density. Matrix-variate analogues are also discussed. In the matrix-variate case, the M-convolutions introduced by the author are shown to be directly connected to densities of products and ratios of statistically independently distributed positive definite matrix random variables in the real case and to Hermitian positive definite matrices in the complex domain. These M-convolutions reduce to Mellin convolutions in the scalar variable case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it