MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Analysis
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

74 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
74 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 1 of 2

Labels cover 0 of 74 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 74 of 74 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affaboutunlabeled
Virtuous act, virtuous dispositions
Thomas Hurka
2006· article· en· Analysis· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
120
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Virtuous act, virtuous dispositions
Thomas Hurka
2006· article· en· Analysis· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
67
citations
affunlabeled
Nostalgia
Scott Alexander Howard
2012· article· en· Analysis· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
Attenuated Representationalism
Angela Mendelovici
2022· article· en· Analysis· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
5
citations
affaboutunlabeled
The Ethics of Microaggression
Regina Rini
2023· article· en· Analysis· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Universal (pluri)subharmonic functions
Paul M. Gauthier, Mohamad R. Pouryayevali
2007· article· en· Analysis· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Solidity and impediment
M. F. Fricke, P. Snowdon
2003· article· en· Analysis· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
afffundunlabeled
The spectre of triviality
Nate Charlow
2019· article· en· Analysis· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Science without Representation
R. Healey
2010· article· en· Analysis· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · stsconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Solidity and impediment
Martín Francisco Fricke, Paul Snowdon
2003· article· en· Analysis· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affunlabeled
Luck, Value and Commitment
Catherine McKinnon
2013· article· en· Analysis· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Corrigendum
Adam Morton
2016· erratum· it· Analysis
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
The gap in the evil-god challenge
Justin Mooney, Perry Hendricks
2024· article· en· Analysis· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
How Wrong Can You Be?
Imogen Dickie
2021· article· en· Analysis· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
The Lottery Problem for Ranking Theory
Gerrit Neels
2025· article· en· Analysis· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Risk attitudes when choosing for others
Yonathan Fiat, Ittay Nissan‐Rozen
2025· article· en· Analysis· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
next →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About