MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283639668 · doi:10.1515/anly-2021-0002

Continuous wavelet transform of Schwartz distributions in 𝒟′(ℝ<sup>𝑛</sup>), 𝑛 ≤ 1

2022· article· en· W4283639668 on OpenAlexaff
J. N. Pandey

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsCombinatoricsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we extend the continuous wavelet transform to Schwartz distributions in D′⁢(Rn) \mathcal{D}^{\prime}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) , n≥1 n\geq 1 , and derive the corresponding wavelet inversion formula (valid modulo a constant distribution) interpreting convergence in the weak distributional sense. The kernel of our wavelet transform is an element ψ⁢(x) \psi(x) of D⁢(Rn) \mathcal{D}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) , n≥1 n\geq 1 , which, when integrated along each of the real axes X1,X2,X3,…,Xn X_{1},X_{2},X_{3},\ldots,X_{n} vanishes, but none of its moments ∫Rnψ⁢(x)⁢xm⁢dx \int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\psi(x)x^{m}\,dx is zero; here xm=x1m1⁢x2m2⁢…⁢xnmn x^{m}=x_{1}^{{m_{1}}}\,x_{2}^{{m_{2}}}\ldots x_{n}^{{m_{n}}} , d⁢x=d⁢x1⁢d⁢x2⁢…⁢d⁢xn dx=dx_{1}\,dx_{2}\ldots dx_{n} and m=(m1,m2,…,mn) m=(m_{1},m_{2},\ldots,m_{n}) and each of m1,m2,…,mn m_{1},m_{2},\ldots,m_{n} is at least 1. The set of such kernel will be denoted by Dm⁢(Rn) \mathcal{D}_{m}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) . But the uniqueness theorem for our wavelet inversion formula is valid for the space DF′⁢(Rn) \mathcal{D}_{F}^{\prime}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) obtained by filtering (deleting) (i) all non-zero constant distributions from the space D′⁢(Rn) \mathcal{D}^{\prime}(\mathbb{R}^{n}) , (ii) all non-zero constants that appear with a distribution as a union as for example for x12+x22+⋯⁢xn21+x12+x22+⋯⁢xn2=1-11+x12+x2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalysisSame topicMathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsFrench-language works237,207