A new inhibitory pathway in the jellyfish<i>Polyorchis penicillatus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Contact of food with the manubrial lips in the genus Polyorchis A. Agassiz, 1862 evokes trains of electrical impulses (E potentials) that propagate to the margin. E potentials are also produced by food stimuli at the margin and tentacle bases. E potentials are shown to be associated with inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (ipsps) in the swimming motor neurons and contribute to the arrest of swimming during feeding. The conduction pathway for E potentials is a nerve plexus located in the endodermal walls of the stomach and radial and ring canals. We have explored the conducting properties of the system; the conduction velocity varies with stimulus frequency but is about 15 cm/s when stimuli are more than 50 s apart. Neurites belonging to the E system run around the margin adjacent to the inner nerve ring, where the swimming pacemaker neurons are located. We suggest that they may make inhibitory synapses on to the swimming motor neurons, but this has yet to be demonstrated anatomically. The reversal potential for ipsps, recorded intracellularly with potassium acetate micropipettes, was estimated to be about –69 mV. Swimming inhibition mediated by this endodermal pathway is distinct from that observed during protective “crumpling” behaviour and that associated with contractions of the radial muscles seen during feeding, though it may accompany the latter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".