MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322052938 · doi:10.7210/jrsj.25.707

Person Following System for the Autonomous Mobile Robot by Independent Tracking of Left and Right Feet

2007· article· en· W2322052938 on OpenAlex
Hiroki Nakano, Yoshitomo Shimowaki, Takashi Yamanaka, Mutsumi Watanabe

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Robotics Society of Japan · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligenceTracking (education)Mobile robotTrack (disk drive)RobotComputer sciencePosition (finance)Feature (linguistics)Left and rightCartEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic person following method by independently tracking left and right feet parts is newly proposed. This method is applicable for small intelligent robot in near future, such as an automatic shopping cart. The proposed method consists of three parts. That is “Detecting and feature-learning of tracked person” part, “Searching lowest position of both feet” part, and “Robot control” part. The Condensation algorithm is utilized to robustly track both feet parts in conplex environment. Hypothesis (particles) are independently prepared for both left and right feet. Experimental results in indoor environment have shown the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it