MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322138869 · doi:10.1371/currents.rrn1040

SeqMonitor: Influenza Analysis Pipeline and Visualization

2009· article· en· W2322138869 on OpenAlexafffund
Norman Macdonald, Donovan H. Parks, Robert G. Beiko

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Currents · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersGenome AtlanticKillam TrustsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMetadataUploadGenBankComputer scienceWorld Wide WebVisualizationPipeline (software)Data scienceData miningBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unprecedented sequencing effort has led to daily submissions of influenza genomes to public repositories such as the NCBI GenBank. With the decreasing cost of genome sequencing, it is expected that rapidly evolving viruses such as influenza will be sampled in even greater depth in the future. Keeping analyses up to date and managing this data is a prime concern for researchers and public-health officials alike. We have developed an influenza sequence pipeline, polymorphism data warehouse, and an interactive web-based analysis program to assist in managing the flow of sequence data. The system provides a framework for studying polymorphic associations with various metadata, for downloading subsets based on metadata criteria, as well as for tracking polymorphisms geographically and temporally. SeqMonitor is accessible at http://ratite.cs.dal.ca/SeqMonitor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS CurrentsSame topicInfluenza Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207