MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322160074 · doi:10.1021/ja3019274

Understanding the Reactivity of Strained Sandwich Compounds with Aluminum or Gallium in Bridging Positions: Experiments and DFT Calculations

2012· article· en· W2322160074 on OpenAlexaff
Bidraha Bagh, G. Schatte, Jennifer C. Green, Jens Müller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryTrimethylsilylGalliumReactivity (psychology)DimerSilylationPolymerizationPolymer chemistryAluminiumMonomerCrystal structureTolueneHexaneCrystallographyMedicinal chemistryCatalysisPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aluminum and gallium dichlorides (Mamx)ECl(2)1a (E = Al; 82%) and 1b (E = Ga; 79%) (Mamx = 2,4-di-tert-butyl-6-[(dimethylamino)methyl]phenyl) reacted with dilithioferrocene or dilithioruthenocene to give [1]ferrocenophanes (2a, 2b) and [1]ruthenocenophanes (3a, 3b), respectively. The galla[1]ruthenocenophane 3b could be isolated from the reaction mixture through precipitation into hexane (50%), while 2a, 2b, and 3a underwent ring-opening polymerization under the reaction conditions of their formation reactions to give metallopolymers (M(w) (DLS) between 8.07 and 106 kDa). Monomer 3b was polymerized using Karstedt's catalyst resulting in an M(w) of 28.6(±6.3) kDa. In order to get an indication of the structure of polymers, bis(ferrocenyl) compounds (Mamx)EFc(2) (E = Al (4a), 51%; E = Ga (4b), 49%) were prepared and characterized by single crystal X-ray analysis. DFT calculations shed some light on the unexpected high reactivity of these new strained sandwich species. Optimized geometries of known aluminum and gallium-bridged [1]ferrocenophanes (Al(Pytsi) (6a), Ga(Pytsi) (6b); Pytsi = [dimethyl(2-pyridyl)silyl]bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl) and [1]ruthenocenophanes (Al(Me(2)Ntsi) (7a), Ga(Me(2)Ntsi) (7b); Me(2)Ntsi = [(dimethylamino)dimethylsilyl]bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl) matched very well with experimental molecular structures. Geometries of species 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b were optimized (BP86/TZ2P) and the structural influence of the tBu group of the Mamx ligand in ortho position was evaluated by optimizing molecular structures of the four unknown species where the ortho-tBu group was replaced by an H atom (2a(H), 2b(H), 3a(H), and 3b(H)). The most pronounced structural effect was seen as a change of the orientation of the bridging moiety with respect to the sandwich unit. As the tBu group was removed, the aromatic ligand moved toward the freed-up space. The energetics (ΔE, ΔH(298K), and ΔG(298K)) accompanied by the structural changes were evaluated by a hydrogenolysis reaction of strained species resulting in Cp(2)M (M = Fe, Ru) and respective aluminum and gallium dihydrides. This nonisodesmic reaction showed that [1]metallocenophanes equipped with the ortho-tBu group were on average 5.5 kcal/mol higher strained (ΔH(298K)) than species where the tBu group was lacking. The investigation of the isodesmic reaction between strained species and Cp(2)M yielding bis(metallocenyl) compounds revealed that the ortho-tBu group sterically interacts with one of the metallocenyl units. The bis(metallocenyl) compounds are model compounds for the respective metallopolymers and one can conclude that even though the ortho-tBu group imposes additional strain on the starting metallocenophanes, this effect cancels out in ROPs because the ortho-tBu group imposes a similar strain on the resulting polymers. The uncovered steric repulsion between the ortho-tBu group and the sandwich moieties probably causes the ortho-tBu to act as an unusually sensitive NMR probe of the tacticity of the polymers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207