MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Computer-Based Simulation of Cardiovascular Stent Implantation.

2007· article· en· W2322175124 on OpenAlexaff
Denis Laroche, Todd J. Anderson, Robert DiRaddo

Bibliographic record

VenueSimulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality
KeywordsStentRestenosisBalloonAngioplastyMedicineArteryFinite element methodRadiologySurgeryBiomedical engineeringStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous stent implantation is the most common intervention for the treatment of a stenosed artery. Intervention strategy, including stent selection, and inflation pressure, is typically determined by clinician’s experience. Restenosis, the most common complication from stenting, has been shown to be strongly related to the mechanics of the intervention. In this work, a finite element model for simulating stent implantation is presented and validated using clinical data. The goal of this numerical tool is to assist clinicians in the selection of appropriate intervention strategy for a specific patient. METHODS: A finite element analysis software developed at IMI is used to solve balloon angioplasty and stent implantation mechanics (Laroche 2006). The software computes the balloon/stent/artery interaction and large deformations that occur during device deployment inside a stenosed artery. It predicts the artery patency and the stress distribution in the arterial wall, for a specific device and inflation pressure. The friction between the balloon, stent and arterial wall are also computed. The accumulated friction work is used as a predictor of endothelium denudation, a known triggering factor of restenosis. The artery is modeled with a nonlinear anisotropic elasto-plastic constitutive model. The simulation starts with the stent mounted around the pre-wrapped balloon and positioned inside the artery. Once the device deployment is completed, the balloon is deflated and the elastic recoil of the stent and artery is predicted. Apart from improvements in constitutive models, the major contribution of this work is the in-vivo validation of the model. This was done using pre and post IVUS images on a patient who underwent stent implantation on the mid-LAD coronary artery. The final artery patency, as predicted by the proposed model, was compared to the post stenting images. Figure 1 shows the balloon/stent model into the artery.FigureRESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The potential of the model to accurately predict the post intervention artery patency is presented. The effect of the device properties, including the mechanical properties of the stent and the artery is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSimulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in HealthcareSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207