MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322266382 · doi:10.1061/40934(252)80

Assessing PCCP Transmission Mains

2007· article· en· W2322266382 on OpenAlexaff
Edward Padewski, Nathan Leshner, Michael Woodcock, Michael S. Higgins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsStemcell Technologies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepth soundingMains electricityEngineeringForensic engineeringElectrical engineeringStructural engineeringGeologyVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Washington Suburban Sanitation Commission (WSSC) has over 400 miles of prestressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP) in its transmission network for potable water, 150 miles of which is larger than 36 inches in diameter. WSSC has recently undertaken a condition assessment of several of their large diameter PCCP transmission mains, including the 96-inch Potomac main and the 60-inch North Adelphi Main. The assessments relied on the application of electromagnetic inspections combined with visual and sounding inspections and acoustic monitoring for the North Adelphi Main. Following the inspections, pipes deemed to be in a state of incipient failure were excavated to confirm the findings and repaired as needed. The focus of the inspections was to assess the condition of the prestressing wire for each pipe section, the structural component that provides the strength to PCCP. Electromagnetic inspections were used to test the condition of the wire. This type of inspection requires entering the pipe and traversing its full length with equipment that is capable of electromagnetically testing the prestressing wire wraps. The technology detects breaks in the prestressing wire and estimates the total number of breaks for each pipe section. Visual and sounding inspections are a reliable method of detecting pipes in an advanced state of distress. The visual portion of these inspections looks for indications of distress resulting from a lack of prestressing. The sounding portion of these inspections rely on impacting the interior surface of the pipe wall with a tapping rod and listening for hollow sounds indicative of a lack of prestressing. The inspection of the 96-inch Potomac main identified two pipe sections that required immediate repair. Excavations of these pipe sections revealed that the prestressing wire for these pipes was heavily corroded with numerous wire breaks. These identification and replacement of these pipe sections most likely avoided a catastrophic failure. For the North Adelphi main, following the inspection, a fiber optic sensor was installed in the main to permit continuous acoustic monitoring. The main was returned to service and is being continuously monitored to detect breaks as they occur in the prestressing wire. These wire breaks will be added to the wire break estimates from the electromagnetic inspection to update the wire break estimates for each pipe section. Using this data, the remaining useful life for each pipe section can be estimated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207