MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322294218 · doi:10.1021/ja2090004

Reaction Mechanism in Crystalline Solids: Kinetics and Conformational Dynamics of the Norrish Type II Biradicals from α-Adamantyl-<i>p</i>-Methoxyacetophenone

2011· article· en· W2322294218 on OpenAlexaff
Gregory Kuzmanich, Cortnie S. Vogelsberg, E.F. Maverick, José Carlos Netto‐Ferreira, J. C. Scaiano, Miguel A. Garcı́a-Garibay

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryConformational isomerismSpectroscopyKineticsNanocrystalline materialCrystallographyQuantum yieldCrystal structureNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyRelaxation (psychology)Reaction mechanismPhysical chemistryComputational chemistryStereochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an effort to determine the details of the solid-state reaction mechanism and diastereoselectivity in the Norrish type II and Yang cyclization of crystalline α-adamantyl-p-methoxyacetophenone, we determined its solid-state quantum yields and transient kinetics using nanocrystalline suspensions. The transient spectroscopy measurements were complemented with solid-state NMR spectroscopy spin-lattice relaxation experiments using isotopically labeled samples and with the analysis of variable-temperature anisotropic displacement parameters from single-crystal X-ray diffraction to determine the rate of interconversion of biradical conformers by rotation of the globular adamantyl group. Our experimental findings include a solid-state quantum yield for reaction that is 3 times greater than that in solution, a Norrish type II hydrogen-transfer reaction that is about 8 times faster in crystals than in solution, and a biradical decay that occurs on the same time scale as conformational exchange, which helps to explain the diastereoselectivity observed in the solid state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207