MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322325915 · doi:10.4133/sageep.28-031

EXAMINATION OF S-WAVE PECULIAR RESONANCE-SPECTRA FOR IMPROVED CHARACTERIZATION OF NEAR SURFACE FLUID-RELEASES FOR EFFECTIVE HAZARD RESPONSE

2015· article· en· W2322325915 on OpenAlexaff
Bilal Hassan, Stephen Butt, Charles A. Hurich

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2015 · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonance (particle physics)BrineSurface waveFree surfaceMaterials scienceGeologyPhysicsMechanicsOpticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hazards associated with aqueous and/or non aqueous toxic fluid-releases into near surface unconsolidated sediments assume a broad range including environmental, geotechnical and geohydrological, as of recent initiatives. This both exacts and promotes an efficient/improved monitoring of near surface. Acoustic and electrical methods potential in assisting prevention and mitigation is well identified/established compared to that of S-waves. S-wave analyses extended results, so, of a laboratory study are reported invoking fresh insights. A fully saturated unconsolidated close-pack of ceramic spheres i.e., 0.5 mm, mutually in elastic contacts in a vertical cylindrical PVC tube (i.e., 45 cm x 5.09 cm) flow-cell/analogue, was sequentially flowed through by oil followed/displaced by brine at controlled constant head conditions against gravity. This immiscible fluid-displacement process was imaged using 1MHz S-wave ultrasonic source-receiver pair facing diametrically at flow-cell midspan. Diffraction/interference resonance affected S-wave spectral peculiarities are examined for inferring, given background characteristics/definitions. Two resonance peaks, marked by amplitude and frequency shift, are observed in each of three different invading flow rate tests i.e., 4, 10 and 55 L/d. A pattern of frequency dependence of viscosity and density associated amplitude effects, in all three tests, separately, enabling isolate fluid phases, is observed. Mixed-zone assumes highest amplitudes but at lower frequencies only, possibly for viscosity and surface tension effect combined. Brine and oil associated amplitudes are comparable magnitude, however former tend to assume higher frequencies while latter overlap those of mixed phase i.e., defining two resonant peaks, with intermediate bandwidth significantly attenuated. Flow rate dependence of displacements/amplitudes is deducible/evident, overall. At lower frequencies viscosity controls amplitudes, while at higher frequencies they appear density sensitive. Significant bandwidth attenuation is caused by scattering and tuning/geometric destructive/interference effects associated with mixed-zone evolution and pluming/fingering. S-waves, given findings, offer a prospective method of enhanced parametric quantification/calibration of fluid/chemical species/responses, central to any effective fluid-release hazard response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2015Same topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207