MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322336173 · doi:10.1149/1.3205663

Effective Transport Coefficients for Porous Microstructures in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

2009· article· en· W2322336173 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceMicrostructureSolid oxide fuel cellDiscretizationAnodeMonte Carlo methodKnudsen diffusionThermal diffusivityPorosityDiffusionCathodePorous mediumMechanicsElectrodeComposite materialThermodynamicsChemistryMathematicsPhysicsMathematical analysisPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical framework to compute the effective transport coefficients for porous electrode microstructures is presented. The anode and cathode electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells are discretized as porous microstructures that are formed by randomly distributed and overlapping spheres with particle size distributions that match those of actual ceramic powders. The technique involves the construction of the composite electrode microstructure based on measureable starting parameters and the subsequent numerical evaluation of the effective transport coefficients. We use both the finite volume method and the Monte-Carlo simulation to enumerate effective transport coefficients. The results of the calculations are compared with experimental data for electron conductivities for a range of solid-matrix compositions. Comparisons are also made with theoretical correlations for effective coefficients. The effect of Knudsen diffusion on effective gas diffusivity is also addressed in this paper. Numerical results are compared with a harmonic average approximation based on Bosanquet's formula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it