MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322372560 · doi:10.1061/40889(201)112

Challenges of No. 7 Subway Line Extension Project's TBM Shaft Design

2006· article· en· W2322372560 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2006 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPQ Corporation (Canada)
FundersNew York Community Trust
KeywordsRedevelopmentExcavationEngineeringLine (geometry)Civil engineeringGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of the New York City's redevelopment of the far west side of the mid-town Manhattan, the No. 7 Subway Line Extension project will add 1.5 miles of twin bored tunnels to the existing subway line and two new subway stations. The underground construction has two major components: (1) Running Tunnel & 34th Street Station Cavern and (2) Tenth Avenue Station & Times Square Connection. The running tunnel contract will have a TBM launching shaft (Shaft A), an Adit connecting Shaft A to the running tunnels, and TBM Assembly Chamber at the southern end of the project, i.e., near 25th Street at Eleventh Avenue, where tunnel excavation begins. This paper will discuss challenges of the design and construction of Shaft A where it meets the Adit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.708
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it