Parent Perspectives on Psychotropic Medication Use and Interactions With Prescribing Health Care Providers Among Adolescents and Adults With an Autism Spectrum Disorder
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults with an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are often prescribed psychotropic medications to treat mental health and behavioral issues, and parents of these individuals play a crucial role in overseeing this care. Despite this, little is known about parents’ experiences managing and monitoring their child’s medication treatment, or their experience interacting with prescribing health care providers. To learn more about parents’ perspectives on psychotropic medication use in their adolescent or young adult with ASD, a focus group was conducted with seven mothers whose adolescent or adult child with ASD was prescribed one or more psychotropic medications. Results are summarized according to emergent themes including parent perception of child experience with medication, side effects, medication efficacy, medication monitoring, expertise issues, and service issues. Parents also provided medication recommendations, including a desire for health care providers with greater expertise in ASD, information on medication, and tools for medication monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it