Comparative Surface Thermodynamic Analysis of New Fluid Phase Formation between a Sphere and a Flat Plate
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the behavior of confined fluid in the gap between a sphere and a flat plate by examining the curve of free energy of the system versus size of the new phase. Four possible situations corresponding to new phase formation out of confined liquid or vapor at pressures above or below the saturation pressure are studied. Using surface thermodynamics, the feasible shape of the meniscus (concave/convex), the possibility of phase transition, as well as the number and the nature (unstable/stable) of equilibrium states have been determined for each of these four situations. The effects of equilibrium contact angle, separation distance of confinement surfaces, and sphere size have been studied. We show that the number and nature of equilibrium states, along with the effect of different parameters in these four possible situations, can be well described under two categories of new phase formation with (a) concave or (b) convex meniscus. Our results reveal that in the sphere-plate gap, stable coexistence of the liquid and vapor phases is only possible when the meniscus is concave (which corresponds to either capillary condensation or capillary evaporation), and when the sphere and plate are separated by a distance less than a critical amount (where that critical amount is always less than the Kelvin radius). With convex menisci, no stable coexistence of liquid and vapor phase is possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it