MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322447463 · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2016.2532847

A Gaussian Mixture Framework for Co-Operative Rehabilitation Therapy in Assistive Impedance-Based Tasks

2016· article· en· W2322447463 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsTask (project management)RehabilitationRobotComputer sciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionSimulationPhysical therapyMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rehabilitation robots can aid patients to practice activities of daily living in order to enhance muscle strength and recover motor functions. In this paper, we focus on robot-assisted rehabilitation for co-operative therapy tasks that elicit impedance-based behaviors from the patient. For instance, if the rehabilitation robot is controlled to behave as a self-closing door and if pulling this simulated door open is the therapy task the patient needs to complete, the patient's hand should display a minimum required impedance to complete the task. When a patient is unable to complete the task, determining the minimum assistance to be provided to the patient by the rehabilitation robot such that the task can be accomplished is of interest. In this paper, we compare the impedance behavior of a therapist in multiple trials of the task with that of the patient using a learning from demonstration (LfD) technique that utilizes Gaussian mixture models. First and during the demonstration phase, the therapist performs the tasks individually so that the robot gains insight into how a healthy person would perform the task. Next and during the reproduction phase, the robot will co-operate with the patient in the therapist's absence and provide him/her with adaptive external assistance on a patient-specific and as-needed basis so that the task can be completed. To encourage active participation, provision of assistance to the patient is coupled to the variability observed in the therapist's behavior across various trials of the task. Therefore, the presented framework transfers the constraints and underlying characteristics of a given impedance-based task to the rehabilitation robot leading to co-operative interaction between the robot and the patient where the robot provides just-enough assistance. Experimental results involving 1-D and 2-D impedance-based tasks show that the proposed framework effectively provides the patient with assistance as needed during co-operative therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it