MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322453388 · doi:10.1021/jp109480p

Ultralong-CNTA-Supported Pd-Based Anodes for Ethanol Oxidation

2010· article· en· W2322453388 on OpenAlexaff
Fengping Hu, Xinwei Cui, Weixing Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina National Tourism Administration
KeywordsAnodeElectrodeMaterials scienceAdsorptionChemical engineeringEthanolCarbon nanotubeDesorptionDirect-ethanol fuel cellInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A three-dimensional ultralong-CNTA-supported Pd-based anode (Pd/CNTA) has been designed for ethanol oxidation. Nano-size Pd particles were uniformly attached to the surface of CNTs within CNTA by using pulse electrodeposition technique. The as-prepared Pd/CNTA anode is featured with low ion diffusion resistance, vertical electron conduction, and large surface area, which offer enhanced active sites for ethanol oxidation reaction and allow fast ion adsorption/desorption from the electrode. The performance of the Pd/CNTA anode is tested and compared with that of Pd/C and Pd/MWCNT (multiwall carbon nanotube) electrodes for ethanol oxidation in alkaline media. The mass activity of the current Pd/CNTA electrode was 17.5 and 10.3 times higher than that of Pd/C and Pd/MWCNT electrodes, respectively. This novel electrode can provide efficient ethanol oxidation and may form a new promising platform for both fundamental investigation of the effects of electrode structure and the development of high-performance alkaline direct ethanol fuel cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207