Comparing growth and maturity of sympatric Atlantic (<i>Gadus morhua</i>) and Greenland (<i>Gadus</i> <i>ogac</i>) cod in coastal Newfoundland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Growth and maturity of two sympatric gadids were examined from 48 Atlantic (Gadus morhua L., 1758) and 42 Greenland (Gadus ogac Richardson, 1836) cod ranging from 17 to 74 cm in length collected from an inshore area of Trinity Bay, Newfoundland, Canada, during 2009 and 2010. Ages estimated from otolith readings ranged from 2 to 7 for both species. Age and size at 50% maturity differed between species, being 2.3 years and 28.2 cm for G. ogac and 4.6 years and 48.8 cm for G. morhua. von Bertalanffy growth models did not differ between species with parameters L∞ = 91 cm, k = 0.16 year−1, t0 = –0.02 years for G. ogac and L∞ = 112 cm, k = 0.13 year−1, t0 = 0.18 years for G. morhua. Length (L) – mass (W) relationships differed; W = 0.000005 kg·cm−b × L3.17 for G. ogac and W = 0.000011 kg·cm−b × L2.91 for G. morhua suggested slightly positive and negative allometric growth, respectively. For G. morhua, growth curves, length–mass relationships, and maturity rates did not differ between fish collected during this and earlier studies. Differences in maturity schedules and growth may decrease resource competition and help facilitate coexistence of these species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".