I Will Continue to Use This Nonetheless: Social Media Survive Users' Privacy Concerns
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study attempts to investigate the attitudes of Japanese social media users with regard to their personal data provision on social media sites and the social responsibility of social media companies in terms of personal data handling. In order to accomplish the purposes of the study, a questionnaire survey and follow-up interviews were conducted. The survey results revealed that the respondents used social media as they like regardless of their recognition of social media companies' and other companies' ways of using personal data they provided on social media sites. Many of the respondents appeared to prefer online socialisation to privacy protection, even though they felt vaguely insecure about their privacy when using social media. Considering the significant influence of social media over users' mental status, identity, autonomy and intellectual freedom, social media companies should provide users with comprehensive and clear explanations about how they collect, store, use, share and sell personal data to take their social responsibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it