MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322600088 · doi:10.1061/41036(342)488

Developments on Stochastic Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (SAMS 2009)

2009· article· en· W2322600088 on OpenAlexaff
José D. Salas, Óli Grétar Blöndal Sveinsson, Taesam Lee, William L. Lane, D. K. Frevert

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009 · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersInnovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAutoregressive modelComputer scienceNonparametric statisticsStochastic modellingParametric statisticsParametric modelMultivariate statisticsStochastic processSoftwareStochastic simulationEconometricsMachine learningProgramming languageMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stochastic Analysis Modeling and Simulation (SAMS) is a software where stochastic techniques are utilized for simulating synthetic water resources data such as monthly streamflows. The current version, SAMS 2007, includes alternative modeling approaches and data analysis features. The stochastic models included in SAMS 2007 are parametric models such as multivariate autoregressive and disaggregation linear models. SAMS 2009 is now available. Various alternatives and options have been added particularly nonparametric techniques. The main purpose of this paper is to summarize the capabilities of SAMS 2009.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207