MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322611310 · doi:10.1107/s174430910901094x

Expression, refolding, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of<i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>AlgE

2009· article· en· W2322611310 on OpenAlexafffund
John C. Whitney, A.M. Neculai, Dennis E. Ohman, P. Lynne Howell

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPhytochemistry and Bioactivity Studies
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenSick Kids Foundation
KeywordsCrystallizationPseudomonas aeruginosaChemistryCrystallographyDiffractionMoleculeStrain (injury)X-ray crystallographyChromatographyBacteriaBiologyPhysicsOrganic chemistryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AlgE is an outer membrane protein present in alginate-producing (mucoid) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AlgE has been overexpressed in insoluble inclusion bodies, purified under denaturing conditions and refolded in a buffer containing decyl beta-D-maltopyranoside. Purified refolded AlgE was detergent-exchanged into n-octyl tetraoxyethylene and diffraction-quality crystals were grown using the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method. The crystals grew as small hexagons with unit-cell parameters a = 98.8, b = 156.8, c = 90.4 A, alpha = beta = gamma = 90.0 degrees . The crystals exhibited the symmetry of space group C222 and diffracted to a minimum d-spacing of 3.0 A. On the basis of the Matthews coefficient (V(M) = 3.28 A(3) Da(-1)), one molecule is estimated to be present in the asymmetric unit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section F Structural Biology and Crystallization CommunicationsSame topicPhytochemistry and Bioactivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207