Potentially Life-Threatening Ictal Bradycardia in Intractable Epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently a high prevalence of asystole was found in individuals with refractory epilepsy. OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence and characterize the pattern of ictal bradycardia (IB) in our cohort. METHOD: We analyzed ictal heart rate (HR) and seizure localization in 69 consecutive individuals with intractable epilepsy. Ictal bradycardia was defined by HR less than 60 beat per min (bpm) and a fall of more than 30 bpm. RESULTS: Ictal bradycardia was observed in 1.9% of seizures and in five individuals (7.2%), who presented IB in 5.7% of their seizures. Four of them had also relative IB (a decrease of HR of more than l0 bpm) in the majority of their seizures. Four additional individuals showed relative IB. CONCLUSION: Ictal bradycardia occurs more frequently than previously thought in individuals with refractory epilepsy. Recognition of individuals with small to moderate ictal HR decrease may help to identify those at greatest risk for asystole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".