MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322769659 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.247.68

Buried Valley Imaging using 3-C Seismic Reflection, Electrical Resistivity and AEM Surveys

2011· article· en· W2322769659 on OpenAlexaffabout
A J -M Pugin, Greg A. Oldenborger, S E Pullan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyAquiferElectrical resistivity and conductivityGroundwaterSeismologyResistive touchscreenChannel (broadcasting)Geophysical surveyGeophoneHydrology (agriculture)Remote sensingGeophysicsGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Canadian Prairies buried valleys are important sources of groundwater. Hydrological methods such as pumping tests provide very limited spatial Information to efficiently predict the sustainability of these aquifers. to obtain a full assessment in three dimensions of such complex reservoir geometry, geophysical Tools are an absolute necessity. the Spiritwood valley in southwestern Manitoba, is a Canada-USA transborder buried-valley aquifer. in March 2010, the Geological Survey of Canada conducted an airborne electromagnetic (AEM) survey (AeroTEM III) over a 1062 km2 area along the buried valley north of the US border. the results show multiple resistive elongated features which have been interpreted as coarse sediment filled channels inside a 15 km wide more conductive valley filled with finer sediments such as diamictons. the spatial distribution, directionality, and size of the channels is complex. Follow up ground surveys were carried out during the summer and included a ground based, multi-electrode electrical resistivity survey to calibrate the resistivity of the various units seen in the AEM data, as well as a high-resolution seismic survey to obtain detailed architectural and depth Information. the seismic data were collected using a Minivib I in inline horizontal vibrating mode (20-240 Hz sweep) at a shot spacing of 6 m and a 3-component (3-C) landstreamer receiver array with 48 sleds spaced at 1.5 m. these data allow us to obtain both shear wave and compressive wave profiles. the younger, less compacted channels were better imaged with P-wave data, while some areas with shallow gas or organic peats were better imaged with S-wave data. the seismic images show detailed sedimentary sequences and permit some inferences on the relative ages of channels formed during multiple ice advances. the sections also showed the presence of other channels, which are interpreted to be infilled with finer sediments based on the seismic facies, and which are not associated with resistive features in the AEM data. This combination of AEM, electric sounding and 3-C seismic profiling provides exceptional 3-D coverage which has highlighted key hydrological features such as buried channel aquifers and potential sub-surface hydraulic pathways or connections. Such Information is critical to groundwater prospecting and to the accurate assessment of recharge and discharge potentials associated with buried valley aquifers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207