MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Lack of Stakeholder Influence on the Greening of Industry:A Developing Country Perspective

2014· article· en· W2322826786 on OpenAlexaff
Asadul Hoque, Amelia Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEnvironmental Sustainability in Business
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStakeholderBusinessDeveloping countryPurchasingStakeholder theoryPerspective (graphical)Corporate social responsibilityStakeholder analysisMarketingPublic relationsEconomic growthEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the low wages, numerous companies are operating factories in Bangladesh. While social concerns have made the news, these industrial units are also polluting communities and ecosystems on a daily basis. This study investigates the role of ten different types of local civil society groups in preventing industrial pollution in Bangladesh. Using a survey design, this study finds that there is among all groups a level of awareness about industrial pollution, and a willingness to take individual purchasing decisions, but an unwillingness to influence others. No group was perceived by others to be playing a role in helping prevent pollution. These findings have implications for the drivers of corporate social responsibility and stakeholder influence in this developing country. This study also challenges the generalizing of current stakeholder influence theory to developing countries by using a continuum to further understand stakeholder influence strategies and impacts from a social movement perspective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management Proceedings→Same topicEnvironmental Sustainability in Business→French-language works237,207→