MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322847963 · doi:10.1515/jag-2012-0052

Dynamic beam deformation measurements with off-the-shelf digital cameras

2013· article· en· W2322847963 on OpenAlexafffund
Ivan Detchev, Ayman Habib, Mamdouh El- Badry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Geodesy · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsServiceability (structure)Structural health monitoringInstrumentation (computer programming)Computer sciencePhotogrammetryDeformation monitoringSystem of measurementProcess (computing)Deformation (meteorology)Real-time computingRemote sensingEngineeringGeologyStructural engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physical health monitoring of civil infrastructure systems is an important task that must be performed frequently to ensure their serviceability and sustainability. Part of this process requires fine-scale monitoring of the structural elements that form the infrastructure system. This has traditionally been done with instrumentation, which either requires contact/access to the structural element, performs deformation measurements in only one dimension, or both. In order to avoid the downsides of the commonly used instrumentation systems, this paper proposes the use of a remote sensing approach based on a three dimensional photogrammetric system. The proposed system is low-cost, consists of off-the-shelf components, and is capable of targetless reconstruction. Also, based on the given configuration and the implemented processing techniques, the system yields deformation measurements well below the submillimetre level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied GeodesySame topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207