MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322850345 · doi:10.3166/jesa.43.871-887

Réseau de neurones doublement récurrent à base de fonctions radiales : RR2FR Application au pronostic prévisionnel

2009· article· fr· W2322850345 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Achraf Jabeur Telmoudi, Slimane Barkit, Lotfi Nabli, Yahya Chetouani, Radhi Mhiri

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase (topology)AnatomyBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a new neural architecture for prediction: Double Recurrent Radial Basis Function network (R 2 RBF). The proposed R 2 RFR is excited by the recurrence of output looped neurons on the input layer. An unsupervised learning algorithm is proposed to determine the parameters of the Radial Basis Function (RBF) nodes. An application of the R 2 RBF network on the values prediction of the time series confirmed that the proposed architecture minimizes the prediction error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207