Biological evaluation of a new family of aminosteroids that display a selective toxicity for various malignant cell lines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the antineoplasic potential of a new family of aminosteroids. The antiproliferative activity of seven 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol derivatives selected from a screening study was measured on nine cancerous cell lines (HL-60, K-562, LNCaP, PC-3, Shionogi, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, BT-20, and OVCAR-3) and two normal cell lines (peripheral blood lymphocytes and WI-38). The aminosteroids efficiently inhibited the cell growth of seven cancer cell lines [inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) values=0.2-6.4 µmol/l] and showed weak toxicity on normal cell lines. Two representative aminosteroids were tested and found to induce apoptosis and a G0/G1 cell cycle block in HL-60-treated cells, but not terminal myeloid differentiation. By a nuclear morphology analysis with fluorescence microscopy, typical apoptotic morphological changes were exhibited by treated cells. One aminosteroid tested in vivo (xenograft model) reduced the breast cancer (MCF-7 cells) tumor growth induced in nude mice. Furthermore, the information gathered suggests that this family of aminosteroids induced growth inhibition cells by arresting the cell cycle and triggering apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it