Is There a Non-linear Relationship between Net Trade Cycle and Corporate Performance in Turkey?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between working capital management and corporate performance for non-financial firms quoted in Borsa İstanbul for the period 2009-2014. The working capital investment decisions of the firms are utmost important since firms can continue their operations without discontinuance, raise their value and reduce risks as long as working capital level is attentively administered. Our research contributes to the working capital literature by investigating the non-linear relation between net trade cycle (NTC) and firm performance, utilising contemporary data and using system Panel GMM method. Our results indicate that there is a non-linear relationship between NTC and corporate performance. This means that there is an optimal NTC value where firm value is maximised. At this optimal working capital level, costs and advantages are poised. This implies that corporate executives should carefully manage their working capital investment and strive to be close to the optimal level as much as possible.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it