MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322963535 · doi:10.1093/notesj/gjr054

Sir Thomas Benger: Ups and Downs of a Master of the Revels

2011· article· en· W2322963535 on OpenAlexaff
C. E. McGee

Bibliographic record

VenueNotes and Queries · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsSt. Jerome's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevelsSociologyClassicsArt historyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

WHEN Lord Protector Somerset fell from power in 1549, his steward of thirteen years, Sir John Thynne, also lost his position at court. After paying fines, forfeiting property, and twice spending time in prison, Thynne withdrew in the early 1550s to Wiltshire, where he dedicated himself to what would be his life's work, the building of Longleat House.1 Thynne's re-location made him more dependent than ever before on his London contacts in order to conduct his legal and business affairs there and to stay abreast of current events in Europe and at court. Because the ‘newsletters’ he received sometimes also reported not only on politics, but also on theatrical entertainments, they shed new light on masques devised by Sir Thomas Benger in the 1560s and on the impact of these entertainments on his career as Master of the Revels. Appointed to that office by warrant on 18 January 1560,2 Benger was immediately under pressure to produce shows appropriate for the celebration of the marriage on Sunday, 25 February of William Brooke, Lord Cobham, and Frances Newton, one of the chamberers of Queen Elizabeth's privy chamber. As one of the letters in the Thynne correspondence makes clear, Benger was up to the occasion. William Honing, who had also lost his position as Clerk of the Privy Council when Somerset fell but continued as one of the clerks of the Signet at this time,3 wrote to Sir John Thynne on 28 February. After noting that the couple solemnly married in the presence of the queen and most of the nobility, Honing reported that ‘that night we had a solempne maske & on shroftewesdaye night a handsom shewe of trivmphe in the hawle besides a fayre maske.’4 Presumably the masques to which Honing alluded included some of those that the accounts of the Revels Office document: one of Nusquams or Clowns for men, another of Actaeon and his hunters for men, and one of Diana and her nymphs for women.5 Honing adds to our knowledge of these court festivities by indicating that there was also a ‘triumph’, that is, ‘a masque-like revel that combined dramatic action with martial combat’6—a form of entertainment that was one of Benger's favourite courtly devices. From Honing's letter we now know that Sir Thomas Benger's career as Master of the Revels began on a high note, for Honing wrapped up his report of the masques by telling Thynne of their impact on Benger's reputation: ‘The newe Mr of the revelles … hath wonne his spurres by his gay devises.’

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1200.027

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.123 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNotes and QueriesSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207