MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323024289 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2012-0368

Effects of intermolecular hydrogen bonding on the excited-state proton transfer properties of the cinnamonitrile–methanol complex

2013· article· en· W2323024289 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Da‐Peng Yang, Ruiquan Qi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryHydrogen bondExcited stateIntermolecular forceMoietyMoleculeMonomerPhotochemistryProtonHydrogenDensity functional theoryGround stateCrystallographyComputational chemistryStereochemistryAtomic physicsOrganic chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) method was used to study the excited-state proton transfer (ESPT) properties of the hydrogen-bonded cinnamonitrile (3TPAN)–methanol (MeOH) complex (3TPAN–MeOH). The intermolecular hydrogen bonds N 1 ···H 11 in both the ground state S 0 and the excited state S 1 were demonstrated by the optimized geometric structures of the hydrogen-bonded 3TPAN–MeOH complex. While in the excited state S 3 , a new hydrogen bond H 11 ···O 1 was formed after the ESPT took place from the hydrogen-bonded MeOH molecule to the 3TPAN moiety. It was demonstrated that the electronic transitions of the S 1 states for both the 3TPAN monomer (including the S 3 state) and the hydrogen-bonded 3TPAN–MeOH complex should be of a localized-excited (LE) nature on the 3TPAN molecule, while the S 3 state of the hydrogen-bonded 3TPAN–MeOH complex should be of charge transfer (CT) character from the hydrogen-bonded MeOH molecule (through O 1 ···H 11 ) to the 3TPAN moiety. The S 3 -state proton transfer and charge transfer due to the intermolecular hydrogen-bonding interaction should be the reasons for the remarkable redshift (0.91 eV) of the S 3 -state electronic energy for the hydrogen-bonded 3TPAN–MeOH complex compared with that of the 3TPAN monomer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer StudiesFrench-language works237,207