MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323079027 · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000745

The Right Treatment at the Right Time in the Right Place

2014· article· en· W2323079027 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Jessica McKee, Derek J. Roberts, Mary H. van Wijngaarden-Stephens, Christine Vis, He Gao, Kathy Belton, Don Voaklander, Chad G. Ball, Ioana Bratu, Geoffrey Ibbotson, Kevin Martin, Paul T. Engels, Damian Paton-Gay, P Parks, Lyle Thomas, J. Guilfoyle, John B. Kortbeek, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Surgery · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalAlberta Hospital EdmontonUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioConfidence intervalTrauma carePoisson regressionProportional hazards modelCase mix indexPopulationHazardEmergency medicineMajor traumaDemographySurgeryInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Objective: To evaluate the implementation of an all-inclusive philosophy of trauma care in a large Canadian province. Background: Challenges to regionalized trauma care may occur where transport distances to level I trauma centers are substantial and few level I centers exist. In 2008, we modified our predominantly regionalized model to an all-inclusive one with the hopes of increasing the role of level III trauma centers. Methods: We conducted a population-based, before-and-after study of patient admission and transfer practices and outcomes associated with implementation of an all-inclusive provincial trauma system using multivariable Poisson and linear regression and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: In total, 21,772 major trauma patients were included. Implementation of the all-inclusive model of trauma care was associated with a decline in transfers directly to level I trauma centers [risk ratio (RR) = 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.88–0.94; P < 0.001] and an increase in transfers from level III to level I centers (RR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.00–1.21; P = 0.04). These changes in trauma care occurred in conjunction with a 12% reduction in the hazard of mortality (hazard ratio = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.84–0.98; P = 0.003) and a decrease in mean trauma patient hospital length of stay by 1 day (95% CI: 1.02–1.11; P = 0.02) after adjustment for differences in case mix. Conclusions: In this study, introduction of an all-inclusive provincial trauma system was associated with an increased number of injured patients cared for in their local systems and improved trauma patient mortality and hospital length of stay. In this population-based, before-and-after study of 21,772 major trauma patients, the implementation of an all-inclusive model of provincial trauma care was associated with an increased proportion of injured patients cared for in their local systems, a significant 12% reduction in the hazard of mortality, and a decrease in trauma patient length of hospital stay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score0.246

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of SurgerySame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207