MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2323152328 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-4309

Abstract 4309: Establishment of the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) as an ex vivo model system to study mechanisms underlying epithelial ovarian tumour growth and metastasis

2011· article· en· W2323152328 on OpenAlexaff
Jason Reed, Rohann Correa, Yudith Ramos-Valdes, Daniela M. Dinulescu, Barbara C. Vanderhyden, John D. Lewis, Gabriel E. DiMattia, Trevor G. Shepherd

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAngiogenesisChorioallantoic membraneMetastasisCancer researchOvarian cancerCell cultureMatrigelCancerPathologyMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) accounts for approximately 90% of all human ovarian malignancies. Unfortunately, 75% of EOC cases are not diagnosed until advanced stages when the tumour has metastasized, after which standard therapy is less effective. Therefore, it remains vital to directly study the molecular and cellular mechanisms contributing to EOC metastasis in an experimentally-tractable system. The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) is a highly-vascularized tissue responsible for gas and nutrient exchange in the avian embryo, and has been used extensively to study angiogenesis and tumour formation by highly-aggressive cancer cell lines. Herein, we report that ascites-derived primary human EOC cells and established EOC cell lines readily form well-vascularized tumours on the chick CAM. To investigate this property further, we have generated GFP-expressing clones from the mouse ovarian tumour cell lines MOSE-RM (oncogenic Ras & Myc overexpression, SV40 TAg), MASC-2 (SV40 TAg), and 4306 (oncogenic Kras & Pten-null) which will facilitate visualization of tumour growth on the CAM as well as complementary studies in syngeneic mouse models for future studies. Xenografts of MOSE-RM and 4306 cell lines onto the surface of the chick CAM establish tumours that are significantly larger in mass and size compared with MASC-2 cells. Importantly, EOC tumours grown on the chick CAM are histologically identical to those arising within the peritoneal cavity. MOSE-RM and 4306 cell lines promote angiogenesis using HUVEC cells and the chick CAM, whereas MASC-2 cells lack this ability. Overall, these results demonstrate that EOC tumour growth on the chick CAM can be exploited as a highly amenable model system for studying late-stage EOC metastasis. Our findings also indicate that neo-vascularization is an obligatory process for establishment of secondary tumours; thus, we are currently investigating signaling pathways that impact primary human EOC tumour growth and angiogenesis using the chick CAM. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4309. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4309

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research→French-language works237,207→