MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323244726 · doi:10.1021/je900054j

Solubility and Stability of Nesquehonite (MgCO<sub>3</sub>·3H<sub>2</sub>O) in Mixed NaCl + MgCl<sub>2</sub>, NH<sub>4</sub>Cl + MgCl<sub>2</sub>, LiCl, and LiCl + MgCl<sub>2</sub> Solutions

2009· article· en· W2323244726 on OpenAlexaff
Mei Dong, Zhibao Li, Jianguo Mi, George P. Demopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical & Engineering Data · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolubilityChemistryDissolutionIsothermal processAtmospheric temperature rangeMagnesiumInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MineralogyNuclear chemistryThermodynamicsChromatographyPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solubility and stability of nesquehonite (MgCO 3 ·3H 2 O) in mixed solutions (NaCl + MgCl 2, NH 4 Cl + MgCl 2, LiCl, and LiCl + MgCl 2 ) were measured by using a classic isothermal dissolution method over the temperature range of (298 to 308) K. The concentration investigated for all salts was up to 0.2 mol·dm −3 NaCl, 1.5 mol·dm −3 NH 4 Cl, 0.6 mol·dm −3 MgCl 2, and 1.5 mol·dm −3 LiCl at ambient temperature. The solubility of MgCO 3 ·3H 2 O phases in all the cases investigated was found to increase with the temperature increment. The comparison of solubility in MgCl 2 solutions and NaCl + MgCl 2, NH 4 Cl + MgCl 2, and LiCl + MgCl 2 mixed solutions has been investigated. XRD and SEM examination of the equilibrated solids showed that nesquehonite in all cases is stable in the temperature range of (298 to 308) K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical & Engineering DataSame topicCalcium Carbonate Crystallization and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207