Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| May 01, 2013 Slope Engineering for Mountain Roads G. J. Hearn G. J. Hearn Editor and Senior Author VanDine Geological Engineering Limited, Victoria, British Columbia V8S 3W2, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information G. J. Hearn Editor and Senior Author VanDine Geological Engineering Limited, Victoria, British Columbia V8S 3W2, Canada Publisher: Association of Environmental & Engineering Geologists First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online Issn: 1558-9161 Print Issn: 1078-7275 © 2013 Association of Environmental & Engineering Geologists Environmental & Engineering Geoscience (2013) 19 (2): 204–205. https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.19.2.204 Article history First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation G. J. Hearn; Slope Engineering for Mountain Roads. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience 2013;; 19 (2): 204–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gseegeosci.19.2.204 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyEnvironmental & Engineering Geoscience Search Advanced Search Review by: D. F. VanDine When I received Slope Engineering for Mountain Roads (Hearn, 2011) and opened it up, the first thing that dropped out was an erratum sheet for Figure C7.31, entitled “Some options for debris flow control and fan crossings.” It turns out that the original figure in the book was not incorrect, but some of the lines on the figure were shown thicker than intended. Immediately, I had a good feeling about this book: first because one of my fields of specialty is debris flow mitigation, and second because the publisher cared enough about the... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it