MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323338992 · doi:10.7202/1034384ar

La ratification sociale du deuil en milieu de travail

2016· article· fr· W2323338992 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Certains parents devront faire face au décès de leur enfant à naître ou de leur nourrisson. Lorsqu’ils reviennent au travail à la suite de cette perte, leur peine est souvent encore vive. Le soutien qu’ils reçoivent de leur supérieur hiérarchique ou de leurs collègues peut cependant faciliter la reprise de leur activité professionnelle. Cette recherche empirique de type exploratoire a pour objectif principal d’examiner le soutien social qu’ont reçu les parents endeuillés de la part des membres de leur organisation lors de leur retour au travail. Des groupes de discussion ont été menés avec des femmes ayant vécu un deuil périnatal. L’analyse de contenu a permis de conclure que le soutien en provenance des membres de l’organisation est fondamental lors du retour au travail mais trop souvent lacunaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.530
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it