MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323348305 · doi:10.1071/aseg2006ab087

The Giant Oyu Tolgoi Porphyry Copper-Gold Deposit Discovery History and Exploration Implications, South Gobi

2006· article· en· W2323348305 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGeochemistry and Geochronology of Asian Mineral Deposits
Canadian institutionsIvanhoe Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorphyry copper depositGeologyPaleozoicGeochemistryMineral resource classificationChinaInner mongoliaCopperMining engineeringPaleontologyArchaeologyGeographyFluid inclusionsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The giant Oyu Tolgoi porphyry copper-gold deposit is the largest of several porphyry copper systems identified in the south Gobi region of Mongolia and northern China (fig. 1)[see full text for figure]. Exploration by Ivanhoe Mines Ltd. has delineated a very large copper and gold resource which has highlighted the economic potential of the south Gobi as a major Palaeozoic porphyry province with in the framework of the Central Asian Mineral Belt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it