MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323353687 · doi:10.1097/pec.0b013e31820461b1

Anticoagulation Therapy

2011· review· en· W2323353687 on OpenAlexaff
Elliot Long, Sandy Pitfield, Niranjan Kissoon

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Emergency Care · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePartial thromboplastin timePulmonary embolismComplicationHeparinSurgeryVascular diseaseIntensive care medicineInternal medicineCoagulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anticoagulation for thromboembolic disease and bleeding, the main complication of anticoagulation therapy, are uncommon but are potentially life- or limb-threatening conditions that may present in the pediatric emergency department. Thromboembolic disease in children usually occurs as a complication of vascular access, primarily in children with congenital heart disease or cancer. However, complications of anticoagulation therapy used in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, and blocked central venous catheter; arterial thromboembolism, including arterial ischemic stroke, Kawasaki disease, and after cardiac surgery, may warrant a visit to n the pediatric emergency department. Anticoagulation therapy may take the form of unfractionated heparin, low-molecular weight heparin, vitamin K antagonists, acetylsalicylic acid, or thrombolytic therapy. Monitoring anticoagulation therapy in children is very important and follows adult guidelines. Anticoagulant dosing may be adjusted based on activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-factor Xa level, and international normalized ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Emergency CareSame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207