MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323398558 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.85.134202

Evidence of fivefold-coordinated Ge atoms in amorphous GeO<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mrow/><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>under pressure using inelastic x-ray scattering

2012· article· lv· W2323398558 on OpenAlexaff
Gérald Lelong, Laurent Cormier, G. Ferlat, Valentina M. Giordano, Grant S. Henderson, Abhay Shukla, Georges Calas

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2012
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmorphous solidOctahedronTetrahedronMaterials sciencePhysicsCrystallographyChemistryCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elucidating pressure-induced structural transitions in glasses at a microscopic level is a formidable challenge. Here, the local environment of amorphous germania ($a$-GeO${}_{2}$) is investigated, from room pressure up to 18 GPa, using in situ inelastic x-ray-scattering measurements at the oxygen $K$-edge. The appearance of GeO${}_{5}$ units at intermediate pressures, a debated yet unsolved issue in the literature, is probed experimentally and their amount quantified. It is found that these units are minority species at all the pressures investigated, discarding the previously proposed fully pentacoordinated glassy state. The presence of GeO${}_{5}$ units, which occur as transient species as the glass undergoes a transition from the tetrahedral to octahedral Ge-coordination states, provides a microscopic basis for the understanding of glass behavior at intermediate pressures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207