MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323443873 · doi:10.3130/aija.77.1207

RANKING OF VARIOUS EDIFICES WITHIN THE PRINCIPAL SECTION, OHOKU GOTEN-MUKI, IN THE WOMEN'S QUARTERS OF EDO CASTLE, UNDER THE DECORATIVE COMPONENTS, ZASHIKI KAZARI, BETWEEN KYOHO- AND MANEN-ERA

2012· article· en· W2323443873 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sachiko Hattori

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban and spatial planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticeStyle (visual arts)Principal (computer security)Quarter (Canadian coin)Section (typography)Life styleHistoryPsychologySociologyPolitical scienceArchaeologyDemographyComputer scienceLawBusinessAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper, following the previous articles, aims to clarify the spatial order of various edifices, existing within the principal sector of women's quarter in the Edo castle, called Ohoku Goten-muki, by taking notice of decorative components, generally phrased as zashiki kazari, during Kyoho-Manen eras. By focusing the arrangement of the interior design and then the style of the everyday life in the sector, as a result, the most prestigious interior-arrangement in the shoin-style, in which tokonoma, chigaidana, tsukeshoin, and chodai gamae were displayed as a set, was employed for the reception room, Gotaimen-jo, within the public edifices after Koka era.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Architecture and Planning (Transactions of AIJ)Same topicUrban and spatial planningFrench-language works237,207