MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323535912 · doi:10.1097/pas.0b013e31828a6727

Clear Cell Odontogenic Carcinomas Show EWSR1 Rearrangements

2013· article· en· W2323535912 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Ann Bilodeau, Ilan Weinreb, Cristina R. Antonescu, Lei Zhang, Sanja Đačić, Susan Müller, Bruce F. Barker, Raja R. Seethala

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluorescence in situ hybridizationPathologyClear cellBiologyOdontogenicHead and neckCellChromosomal translocationMedicineCarcinomaGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clear cell odontogenic carcinomas (CCOCs) are a rare tumor of the jaws, which have considerable morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap with (hyalinizing) clear cell carcinomas (CCCs) of salivary origin. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for EWSR1 was performed on 12 CCOCs, 14 CCCs, and a control set of other miscellaneous clear cell tumors of the head and neck region. EWSR1 was rearranged in 12/13 (92.3%) CCCs and 5/8 (62.5%) CCOCs. EWSR1 testing failed in 1 CCC and 4 CCOCs. Two cases initially diagnosed as CCOCs that were negative for the EWSR1 translocation, were reclassified as clear cell calcifying epithelial odontogenic tumors. ATF1 involvement was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in 1 CCOC. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time the EWSR1-ATF1 translocation in a CCOC and demonstrate a concrete link between CCCs and at least a subset of CCOCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations186
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Surgical PathologySame topicOral and Maxillofacial PathologyFrench-language works237,207