MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323554466 · doi:10.1097/nur.0000000000000062

Performance Improvement Methods to Optimize Clinical Workflow

2014· article· en· W2323554466 on OpenAlexaff
Terri Gocsik, Amy J. Barton

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nurse Specialist · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Canadian institutionsCentennial College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentennialCenter of excellenceExcellenceWorkflowInformaticsLibrary scienceNurse AdministratorManagementHealth informaticsCenter (category theory)NursingSociologyMEDLINEPolitical scienceMedicineComputer scienceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Author Affiliations: Senior Manager (Ms Gocsik), Aspen Advisors, Clinical Informatics Center of Excellence, Morrison, Colorado; Professor and Associate Dean for Clinical and Community Affairs (Ms Barton), College of Nursing, University of Colorado, Centennial. The authors report no conflicts of interest. Correspondence: Amy J. Barton, PhD, RN, FAAN, College of Nursing, University of Colorado, 7983 S Trenton St, Centinnial, CO 80112 (amy.b[email protected]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.468
Teacher spread0.410 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Nurse SpecialistSame topicNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationFrench-language works237,207