MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323575290 · doi:10.2514/6.iac-03-t.p.04

Design and Completion of the PMDIS/TRAC Table

2003· article· en· W2323575290 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas Sturm

Bibliographic record

Venue54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Exploration and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTRACTable (database)Computer scienceCompletion (oil and gas wells)Petroleum engineeringDatabaseEngineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PMDIS: “Perceptual-Motor Deficits In Space (York University Toronto, Prof. Dr. Berry Fowler)” and TRAC: “Test of Reaction and Adaptation Capability (German Sports University Cologne, Prof. Dr. Ottmar Bock)” are experiments of an international space project. The experiments are conducted onboard the Space Shuttle (STS-115) and on the International Space Station (ISS). This paper elucidates the design of the main mechanical device on which the PMDIS/TRAC experiments are carried out; namely the PMDIS/TRAC table. The design of the table was driven by the following factors: experiment specific requirements rules and regulations related to manned space flights manufacturing technology and economic viability The result of the design process was a collapsible and modifiable aluminium table. The components of the hardware were manufactured using CNC technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space LawSame topicSpace Exploration and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207