MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323584164 · doi:10.1097/iop.0b013e3181c0e180

Two Cases of Periocular Cutaneous Angiosarcoma

2010· article· en· W2323584164 on OpenAlex
Damrong Wiwatwongwana, Valerie A. White, Peter J. Dolman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAngiosarcomaEyelidMalignancyRadiation therapyDistant metastasisLesionSurgerySurgical excisionAdjuvant radiotherapyAdjuvant chemotherapyHemangiosarcomaChemotherapyDermatologyMetastasisRadiologyCancerPathologyBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiosarcoma is a rare malignancy with only 8 previous reports of eyelid involvement. The authors report 2 further cases, one as a primary lesion and the other as a recurrence from a contiguous area. In both cases, the lesions appeared relatively inconspicuous, and their extent during micrographic excision was considerably larger than anticipated. Although wide surgical margins were obtained and adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy was undertaken, one patient had died from distant metastasis, while the second had distant cutaneous recurrences within 1 year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it