Numerical Evaluation on Heat Transport Characteristics Between Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and ZnO Materials in Nanoscale Situation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this article is to provide a systematic method to perform numerical evaluation on the cross-plane thermal conductivity of Al(2)O(3)/ZnO film interface. The Equilibrium Molecular Dynamics (EMD) simulations method is used to investigate the cross-plane thermal conductivity of Al(2)O(3)/ZnO film interface along the direction of Z axis at different equilibrium temperature and film interface thickness. The Buckingham two-body potential function and Green-Kubo linear response theory are used for modeling and calculation. The results show that the size effect is obvious. It implies the film interface thickness is 23.4-52 Å and the equilibrium temperature is 300-600 K. The cross section thermal conductivity of Al(2)O(3)/ZnO film interface increases with the increase of interface thickness, and decreases with the increase in equilibrium temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".